Many JA4 implementations in the wild do not follow the
specification. If the value above is not the one you expected,
one of the readings below probably produced yours: each is
recomputed against this same ClientHello, so a match tells you
which implementation a third-party value came from rather than
leaving you to conclude the two describe different clients.
They diverge on two asymmetries. The a-section counts every
non-GREASE extension, while the c-section hashes a sorted copy
of that same list with SNI (0x0000) and ALPN (0x0010) removed;
and the signature algorithms appended after that sorted list
keep their wire order, unsorted. Each entry carries the
sentence of the specification that settles it. One is not an
error: stripping the ephemeral extensions is a deliberate
convention, considered and declined by the specification's
authors.
A reading marked "same for this client" produces the conformant
value for this ClientHello, so a third-party value matching it
could have come from either. Most readings separate only on
particular client shapes: no ALPN, fewer than ten ciphers,
GREASE signature algorithms, a resumed handshake.